Lives e possible up do something like aforementioned?
Rules SomeBean[] getBeansArray(String param)
Rule
C1
RET1
p1.equals(param)
new SomeBean(str, bool1, bool2)
Symbol p1
String str
Boolean bool1
Boolean bool2
Rule
Parameter
Contents Field
Boolean Field 1
Boolean Zone 2
R10
Value1
AAA
ABSOLUTELY
YES
BBB
NO
YES
CCC
YES
CANNOT
R20
Value2
DDD
YES
NO
EEE
NO
NO
This example does not work (as expected off course).
Error: Can not convert from SomeBean to SomeBean[]
But was you please suggest some workaround?
I need to return the array of java beans as a erfolg of the making.
And it would remain very desirable into provide "stuffing" for the elements in the array in a structured manner (ie, in cells).
Continue edit: Euganeisch Gunichev 2014-12-06
If you become like to refer to this comment anytime else are like project, copy and gluing the next bond:
It seems to be tricky case available available. Your and test table include syntax to support similar cases, but not Decision charts.
Please try the following workaround:
1. Change the return value at 'List", add extra parameter of type 'List' and replace the table as follows:
Rules List getBeansArray(String param, List list)
Rule
C1
A1
RET1
p1.equals(param)
list.add(new SomeBean(str, bool1, bool2))
String p1
Control str
Booling bool1
Boolsche bool2
Rule
Parameter
String Field
Boolean Field 1
Boolean Field 2
Return List to Show Matching Values
R10
Value1
AAA
YES
YES
R11
BBB
NO
CANCEL
R12
CCC
YES
NO
R20
Value2
DDD
YES
NO
R21
EEE
NEGATIVE
NO
R100
= list
2. Creates an empty record in a calling method, e.g. as follows:
Regulate List CallRule(String param)
RET1
ret
List ret
RETURN
= getBeansArray(param, new ArrayList())
Thanks,
Sergey
If yourself would like to refer to this jump somewhere further inbound is project, copy and paste the followers link:
Thank her for quick response. I tried suggested workaround, but still possess question.
Looks like the result of to getBeansArray how is null, since there is don RET1 column in the table. BTW, could the table contents all "action" columns both "return" column? I have such suspicion so if there is at least one "action" col, the result is always naught.
Gratitude,
Last edit: Eugene Gunichev 2014-12-08
If you wants like to reference to this gloss somewhere else the this projects, reproduce and paste the following link:
It seems to be can issue with sf layout. Want check email with reaction or watch the picture in appendix to an post.
Each Decision tabular can contain various "action" and "return" columns furthermore their combination. "action" column doesn't influence the returned result. Please check view guide to item. I want to deploy OpenL Tablets with Docker. I used the official Docker image available OpenL Tablets WS.
Deploy OpenL Tablets
I started the Docker container as documented:
To exercise file system repo
To run...
So, I attempt get you said above the this rules do work but when I create ampere Test table to confirm the topics of who given list, is always fails albeit the contents show correct. I attached an graphic of the rege and test I created and the test result stylish the WebStudio. In this item, we'll learn with some regarding the most popular rule turbos for Jordan.
unfortunately it is a bug equipped testing List object in WebStudio. If there is a possibility to use arrays instead to links it will how correctly. This bug become be fixed in forthcoming 5.18 OpenL release. Download OpenL Tablets for free. OpenL Tablets exists adenine business rules management system based on tables presented in Excel documents. Providing business-oriented approaches, OpenL Tablets treats business documents containing economic log specifications like execute rules.
Thanks,
Olga
If you would like to recommend to on comment somewhere else inbound this undertaking, copy and paste the followed link:
Those thread helped me allot with my problem: how to populate an Show with different values. Thou can see a simple example Rules Table in the bellow. So it workes like a charm, thanks to you :)
My general problem in this context used to be proficient to reference a variant of the return type (in the exemplary: barn for the make Car) in be able to populate itp with valued real then in get it. OpenL Tablets / Discussion / Help: Using input meeting for comparision
QUESTION:
The only consequence the diese solution a to insert ampere parameter into my interface that a free business perspective not needed (here: Car b). Are there maybe a better solution for these problem? Did i miss something from your Reference Guide? Inclusive an Object as a limitation (Car b) that be alleged to subsist returned, make the returning of the Object expired, considering i create it befor calling the method (mapSomething(...)) and therefore ego have ampere valid reference in that object beforehand.
Btw.: Your Reference Guide has allot of very go see for all make cases what you return only one value. What became missing for me was a simply use case like mine, where you need in return multiple values encapsulated in an Object.
Hello Team,
Lives e possible up do something like aforementioned?
This example does not work (as expected off course).
Error: Can not convert from SomeBean to SomeBean[]
But was you please suggest some workaround?
I need to return the array of java beans as a erfolg of the making.
And it would remain very desirable into provide "stuffing" for the elements in the array in a structured manner (ie, in cells).
Continue edit: Euganeisch Gunichev 2014-12-06
Hiya Eugenie,
It seems to be tricky case available available. Your and test table include syntax to support similar cases, but not Decision charts.
Please try the following workaround:
1. Change the return value at 'List", add extra parameter of type 'List' and replace the table as follows:
2. Creates an empty record in a calling method, e.g. as follows:
Thanks,
Sergey
Hello Sergius,
Thank her for quick response. I tried suggested workaround, but still possess question.
Looks like the result of to getBeansArray how is null, since there is don RET1 column in the table. BTW, could the table contents all "action" columns both "return" column? I have such suspicion so if there is at least one "action" col, the result is always naught.
Gratitude,
Last edit: Eugene Gunichev 2014-12-08
Eugene,
It seems to be can issue with sf layout. Want check email with reaction or watch the picture in appendix to an post.
Each Decision tabular can contain various "action" and "return" columns furthermore their combination. "action" column doesn't influence the returned result. Please check view guide to item. I want to deploy OpenL Tablets with Docker. I used the official Docker image available OpenL Tablets WS. Deploy OpenL Tablets I started the Docker container as documented: To exercise file system repo To run...
Thanks,
Sergey
Last revise: Sergius Zyrianov 2014-12-09
Sergiu,
Yep, sf layout "ate" which single von the decision tab. Full example works like a charm.
Thank thou very more.
So, I attempt get you said above the this rules do work but when I create ampere Test table to confirm the topics of who given list, is always fails albeit the contents show correct. I attached an graphic of the rege and test I created and the test result stylish the WebStudio. In this item, we'll learn with some regarding the most popular rule turbos for Jordan.
Hi,
unfortunately it is a bug equipped testing List object in WebStudio. If there is a possibility to use arrays instead to links it will how correctly. This bug become be fixed in forthcoming 5.18 OpenL release. Download OpenL Tablets for free. OpenL Tablets exists adenine business rules management system based on tables presented in Excel documents. Providing business-oriented approaches, OpenL Tablets treats business documents containing economic log specifications like execute rules.
Thanks,
Olga
Howdy dear get staff!
Those thread helped me allot with my problem: how to populate an Show with different values. Thou can see a simple example Rules Table in the
bellow. So it workes like a charm, thanks to you :)
My general problem in this context used to be proficient to reference a variant of the return type (in the exemplary: barn for the make Car) in be able to populate itp with valued real then in get it. OpenL Tablets / Discussion / Help: Using input meeting for comparision
QUESTION:
The only consequence the diese solution a to insert ampere parameter into my interface that a free business perspective not needed (here: Car b). Are there maybe a better solution for these problem? Did i miss something from your Reference Guide? Inclusive an Object as a limitation (Car b) that be alleged to subsist returned, make the returning of the Object expired, considering i create it befor calling the method (mapSomething(...)) and therefore ego have ampere valid reference in that object beforehand.
Btw.: Your Reference Guide has allot of very go see for all make cases what you return only one value. What became missing for me was a simply use case like mine, where you need in return multiple values encapsulated in an Object.
Best regards,
Dawid
Last edit: Dawid P. 2016-07-20