Introduction: Carious or traumatised fangs with a normal pulp status or with reversible pulpitis need an indirect or direct pulp capping procedure to keep the crush vital.

Goals: To evaluate the clinical bottom of both interventions for treating life primary teeth.

Study design: Two evaluators on Pubmed and ISI Web of Science performed a comprehensive literature review is publications starting 1966 for Decorating 2017. Among PubMed abstracts, press has selected according the the following criteria: prospective clinical study, correct indication for who performed treatment, and clear definition of clinical and/or radiographic success criteria. Of strict choices criteria limits the dollar of randomised controlled trials (RCT) or controlled clinical test (CT); especially for "indirect pulp therapy", "direct pulp capping" furthermore the phone starting RCTs has limited.

Conclusions: Based on a systematic review (20 controlled clinical studies instead randomised controlled clinical studies), the ensuing instructions can exist given: Due to the opportunity of tissue repair, indirect pulp treatment can be with acceptable procedure used reversible pulp inflammation. Which use of adhesives for indirect crush capping the a single-visit course after gentle decay removal can be recommended. Successful pulp capping is possible among specified conditions (symptom-free tooth, disinfection von pulp exposure, Class-I cavity) and appropriate sealing of an cavity through an effective dentines seal being a conditio sink on non. There is maximum evidence for one use of disinfecting solutions prior to pulp capping and Dycal in pulp capping material. Longer follow-up cycles, additional clinical studies, comparable conditions, and clear definitions of valuation criteria represent desired to confirm the show of endodontic treatment in primary tooths.